Change Without Consent
by Dr. Adrian H. Krieg
In a Republic the people are
supposed to choose, not the government!
All other considerations aside, I have
been reading some old newspapers magazines and essays form the 19th
and 20th centuries, that resulted in a to me startling discovery.
One might even say monumental discovery. What I found was that the most
important occurrences of those centuries were missing from the journals that
purport to keep us informed. Many things that we know took place because of the
enactment of law relating there to, seem to have been sucked up in a vacuum of
time and space leaving nothing but the implemented change of the act behind.
The occurrence of the passing of the
16th amendment to the constitution purportedly ratified on Feb. 13th
1913, was without any doubt the single most important legislative occurrence of
the 20th century, it having the greatest and longest lasting effect
on the citizens of the nation. In a review of the media year of the 16th
amendment it was granted one column inch of a four-page supplement of 1913. The
New York Times (Page One) 1851 to 2001 neglects even to mention the 16th
amendment. The NY Times did not mention the implementation of the 16th
amendment until September 23 1914, in a very short column that was essentially
a listing of the FRS stockholders. The so-called IRS statute is the most
profound act ever made by congress seconded only by the 17th
amendment, which got the same short shift. These acts changed America from a
Constitutional Republic to a centralized federal democracy.
The removal of the original 13th
amendment after the war of 1812-15 is not noted anyplace. It is in fact, as if
it never existed. Had it not been for some researchers who turned up copies of
the constitution from before the war we might have been kept in the dark about
it. The original 13th dealt with titles (Esq.) among others;
prohibiting their use, while at the same time placing some severe restrictions
on the legal profession. It was eventually replace with a new 13th
amendment in 1865.
The 14th amendment was
illegally made part of the Constitution. It is claimed to have been ratified on
July 9th 1868, the Secretary of State having perjured himself, just
after the war is not mentioned either, nor is the fact that it was never
ratified and was made law in the absence of legality. The Constitution requires
a 2/3rds majority of the states to ratify any change or addition to the
Constitution; this did not take place in the 14th. At the time there
were 37 states in the union; 2/3rds would be 28 states. States, which voted for
22, States which voted against 12. States not voting 3. States which withdrew
their vote 2.
The FRS (Federal Reserve System was
also implemented in 1913 and we learn from an article in the NY Times dated
Sept. 23 1914, (just a bit after the fact) that the FRS is a private
corporation whose stockholders are the largest banks and their foreign
affiliates. This corporation (FRS) has never in its entire history been
audited, presented a financial statement, nor been held accountable by any
government agency. They control the prime interest rates; the currency is
issued at their orders, they control the value of the dollar, and they collect
the interest from taxpayers on the national debt. Their collection agent is the
IRS. Total research finds one coming up wanting in regards to the FRS, the
original NY Times article seems to be the only one of a national publication
ever to mention that the FRS is in fact not a governmental agency. They and
they alone orchestrated the great depression in order to consolidate their hold
of the new smaller banks. An act they repeated in the Clinton administration
when they successfully forced over 900 Savings and Loan banks into
bankruptcies, thus consolidating their hold on banking. Today they do this
through mergers and acquisitions and in 2008-09 through another depression
effort. At the rate banks are consolidating and failing and being bailed out we
will be left with very few banks by the end of the next decade.
Congress and the media are far from
the only culprits in this long travesty of justice. The executive branch has
found an entirely new process to change and make law in violation of the
constitution Article one paragraph one. Changing and making law by the executive
branch (president) is prohibited in the Constitution. The use of EO’s
(Executive Orders) has been used by every president since Washington. However
until FDR (Roosevelt) such EO’s were used strictly for administrative matters
relating to the presidency. Ordering furniture, letterheads, china, or the
hiring of staff was the only use of EO’s. FDR drastically changed that by
issuing more EO’s than all the combined presidents that came before him.
Furthermore he began the process of making law through EO’s. Since then all
presidents of both Republocrats parties have used the process to circumvent
Congress, the Constitution and the people, as well as the judiciary. Through
this they have destroyed the original concept of the separation of powers and
have made the presidency omnipotent.
The most egregious act taken, as an EO
was Clinton’s illegal implementation of a treaty, that he called an agreement,
NAFTA. All treaties become part of constitutional law and are law. The
enactment of NAFTA by Clinton through an EO, is illegal, and was challenged by
the United Steel Workers Union to the Appellate court in Birmingham AL. It was
kicked up to the Supreme Court in due time which refused the case, stating
their opinion that this was a legislative matter and that congress had to rule
on it. In other words the Supreme fools copped out of their responsibility of
enforcing the Constitution, while a wimpy feminized congress lacks the guts to
challenge the executive. Perhaps a more reflective prognostication would be
that congress has no interest at all in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights
but only in getting themselves re-elected to their plush jobs and numerous
perks.
I believe that the aforementioned
matters clearly point to a direction, and that America that has been changed
from a Republic to a Democracy is now being changed into an empire. The
hallmark of all empires is the direct and indirect rule of outside forces. I do
not believe that it is possible to dispute that we are ruling directly and
indirectly the majority of the world. Direct rule is in Afghanistan where we
have installed an administrator puppet, who can more correctly be called the
mayor of Kabul. In Iraq we have installed another CIA puppet governor. Our
indirect rule extends over Korea, Germany, most of Latin America, the Caribbean
basin, and through economic pressure the Indian sub continent, the list is
endless. The astounding matter however appears to be that our empire is not
ruled over by us, but rather by an outside force whose bidding we seem to
follow with shocking regularity.
It is the Neo-Cons who have taken over
not only our government but also the media. Through long planning and the
excellent executions of their plans they have finally in 2009 come to control
it all. These vile Zionists, who have changed our Christian republic into a
shadow, to the Zionist state, are as you read in firm control of all the levers
of power. Criticism is not tolerated, as numerous patriots languishing in
various jails can attest to. America now has the honor of having the largest
in-prison population in the world. Anyone who cannot be convicted of some
obscene and altered federal or state statue is firmly vilified by the media.
Not even members of congress are exempt from it. Through the control of the
judiciary, some trumped up charges are leveled and through control of the
courts, prosecutors, and attorneys all is taken care of and a conviction is
guaranteed. We can all think of numerous people now so incarcerated. The
process of selective enforcement of laws that cannot be clearly understood by
anyone is the means of their actions. The body of American law in the 21st
century is so diverse, convoluted, and in continual flux, as to make the
understanding of it impossible. Selective enforcement of laws unknown or not
understood by the citizens are used as a control weapon against the electorate.
Before we go further we should
consider the means, which makes all this possible. For this we must examine the
political dialogue and the media, which reports on it. In application to both
politicians and the media several rules apply. 1) Regardless of the facts in
any situation strenuously avoid any discussion of them. 2) Become indignant if
anyone brings the true fact to light, and then change the venue to some side issue.
3) Reiterate lies as published by others with whom you are in accord
repeatedly. 4) Create a straw issue that will be easy for you to repudiate 5)
Sidetrack real discussion and slander your opponents through the many idioms
developed; “right wing, kooks, conspiracy buffs, radicals, militias, racists,
religious fanatics, Christian ideologues, and so forth. 6) Strike and
disappear; i.e. make any ridiculous attack on your opposition and then walk off
before it can be responded to. 7) Question the motives of your opposition, as
hidden motives, or special agenda, or bias agenda. 8) Claim expertise on the
issue. 9) Fein silence by pretending you do not understand the opposition
issues. 10) Paint the issue as one of such complexity that it is insoluble. 11)
Demand of the opposition a compete solution to the problem at hand even though
you have none. 12) Eliminate the need to reply by removing the evidence. 13)
Change the subject. 14) Ignore all evidence and demand such total evidence as
is unavailable. 15) Introduce fake manufactured evidence. 16) Create
distractions. 17) Install your own experts as referees, and cloak them in the
mantle of Judeo/Christianity. 18) Silence your critics by not reporting their
actions or evidence. 19) Slander the opposition through falsely linking them
with unpopular organizations (Nazis, Skin Heads, conspiracy kooks, etc.) 20)
Accuse your opponents by innuendo of any unpopular theme. What these things
are, are the tools of propaganda. All are used by the political system and the media
and by that I mean all the Republocrats, as well as the media.
I should be clear to point out that America as
well as England both of which have a two party political system do not in fact
have any political diversity but have a system to which the members of both
parties belong and that has the exact same agenda.
All of these 20 principals were used in the build up to the war with Iraq, and by that I mean both wars. From the lies in televised testimony before congress in Gulf one, to the lies of George Bush the lesser in his fabrications of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear arsenals, missile capability, mobile weapons labs, and all the rest.
The fact that both political parties in both nations have the same agenda can be demonstrated by the information that in both cases all of the parties without exception supported entrance into the EU, NAFTA, GATT, and WTO. These multi-national treaties and agreements demonstrate the total control of the multi-national corporations over the political scene in both nations. And we certainly know who controls the multi-national business interests, media, and politics, but particularly in the banking sector. Unless you are brain dead you must know what faction Rothschild, Greenspan, Emanuel, Axelrod, Rubin, Geithner, Bernanke, Summers, Chertoff, Schiliro, Orszag, Steinberg, Eisner, Bronfman, Pele, Wolfowitz, Lieberman, and Frank belong to. These people are so diabolically perverse that a very large percentage of them hold Israeli passports, while working for the American government and fawning allegiance to our land and under penalty may never ever be criticized
Dr. Krieg’s latest book is: The American Dream/Nightmare…Obama’s Plan ISBN 978-0-9824963-0-5